Week 4: 09 Nov 2009, Monday.
People involved:
1) Susan &Carol 1.05pm
2) Elizah &Xiao Shi 1.30pm
3) Laura &Linda 2.05pm
4) Giny &Elien 2.30pm
Week 5: 16 Nov 2009, Monday.
People involved:
1) Eugene Lim &Desmond 1.05pm
2) Ruixiang &Samson 1.30pm
3) Cherie &Huimin 2.05pm
Week 6: 23 Nov 2009, Monday.
People involved:
1) Pei Yun &Witri 1.05pm
2) Melissa &Jeline 1.30pm
3) Eugene Tan &Weijie 2.05pm
4) Peijin &Boxin 2.30pm
Please refer to your Blackboard for more details.
Articles will be released 1 week before the commencement of your CA1 session.
Please print it out and bring it to your CA1 session.
Please also prepare opinions for your partner's article.
Select your articles wisely!
Good luck DAC05!
| Components assessed | Part A (40 marks) Interpretation of writer’s stand and argument | Part B (60 marks) Personal response to the text and issue |
| Outcomes in terms of the student’s ability to: | State the stand of the writer accurately and fully. Identify the arguments / reasons and supporting details put forward by the writer in support of his stand. A= 32-40 B= 28-31 C= 24-27 D= 20-23 Marginal F =16-19 Poor F=below 16 | Give a clear and thorough response to the writer’s stand and arguments, and justify it convincingly. Demonstrate a keen ability to pinpoint weaknesses or recognize strengths in the writer’s arguments Share personal views about the issue · logically and clearly · with clear and well-worded arguments to support his stand · with useful and effective supporting details for his arguments, and · without making unfair remarks Exchange personal views about an issue with another person · logically and clearly · with clear elaboration A= 48-60 B= 42-47 C=36-41 D=30-35 Marginal F =24-29 Poor F=below 24 |
-ZAAC-
